Intelligence engine
Intelligence research platform
The research platform that does the heavy lifting.
You make the call.
Stop vetting by media kit and gut feel. Pinkk researches any creator, brand, or affiliate, cross-checks traffic, audience, and risk across every public source, and grades the evidence. You make the call.
Decisions deserve more than surface metrics.
Follower counts, engagement rates, and media kits show you what someone wants you to see — not whether the numbers are credible or worth the budget.
Signals move before you notice
Audience quality, compliance, and traffic patterns can degrade while a profile still looks healthy.
Risk you find out about too late
One bad partnership can cost more than a year of research.
Decisions you can't defend
A gut feel doesn't hold up when you have to show your evidence.
One workflow. From first signal to final decision.
Every stage of the intelligence process, connected. Here's where Pinkk fits.
Active stage
Add research capacity without adding headcount.
Collecting, organising, and structuring the evidence is the slow part. Pinkk handles that, so your analysts spend their time on the judgment they are there to make.
Doing it by hand
- Five sources stitched together by hand.
- A six-profile shortlist takes two days.
- The reasoning lives in one analyst's head.
Pinkk at work
- One structured report, every signal reconciled.
- The same shortlist takes an afternoon.
- A verifiable record anyone can follow.
Profile comparisons · Go Deeper · Change Tracking · Scheduled monitoring
Sable does the research. Pinkk makes it usable. You make the call.
Research workspace
Pinkk
Decision maker
You, the analyst
A grade is not a verdict.
Pinkk's findings reflect the strength of available evidence — not a binary judgment about whether a profile is good or bad.
A lower grade or confidence rating may indicate insufficient data, conflicting signals, or an area that needs further investigation. It does not automatically mean a profile is problematic.
Where evidence is thin, we say so explicitly rather than dressing it up as a conclusion. A false green light on a significant budget decision is more dangerous than an honest "the evidence here is limited."
The analyst reads the findings, weighs the confidence levels, and makes the final call. That is the design.
High confidence
Signals are clear, consistent, and well-corroborated across multiple independent sources. The finding is well-supported.
Lower confidence
Evidence is thinner, drawn from fewer sources, or contains conflicting signals. Flagged explicitly — not averaged away or hidden behind strong language.
Uncertain or missing
Where data is unavailable, unreliable, or contradictory, the gap is shown rather than filled with a guess. Uncertainty is information.
Evidence before you decide.
Every block below starts with a real decision, a documentation need, or a monitoring gap — and shows how Pinkk closes it.
You're about to make a decision with real consequences
Analyze any creator, brand, or affiliate before a deal. See traffic quality, audience composition, cross-platform signals, and risk — not just the media kit.
For anyone who needs evidence before committing.
You need to document why you made the call
Verify traffic sources, regulatory context, and compliance signals before onboarding. Get structured findings you can document for audits.
For teams that need defensible, auditable research.
The situation changes, but your review process doesn't
Set analyses on a schedule and use Change Tracking to see what shifted between runs. Relationships stay current without manual reviews.
For anyone who needs to stay current without the manual work.
One subject. The whole footprint. One report.
Social profiles, websites, blogs, news, and video. If it is public, it is in scope — and Pinkk reconciles it into one report.
Social profiles
Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Twitch, X, and more — audience quality, growth signals, and brand safety context.
Websites & domains
Authority, backlinks, search presence, and technical trust from DNS, TLS, SPF, and DMARC.
Blogs, articles & news
What is written about them, and how recent coverage ranks against partnership risk.
Video & channels
Channel credibility, subscriber trajectory, content compliance, and audience consistency.
Any public input
A handle, domain, token, brand name, or free-form question. Nothing to create or configure first.
Every source reconciled
Signals from every source land in one report. Inconsistencies surface as findings, not footnotes.
What every report covers
Executive summary with verdict and confidence level, key findings with evidence, traffic source analysis, audience quality assessment, compliance context, and recommended next steps — all in one document you can export, share, or verify publicly.
Verifiable
Every report has a reference number anyone can check at /verify — no account needed.
Conservative by design
We show what the evidence supports. Where confidence is low, we say so — a false green light on a $10k deal is worse than an honest "we're not sure."
No lock-in
Credits never expire. Cancel anytime. You only pay for reports that complete successfully.
Structured evidence for every decision.
$29/month
$290/year
Billed annually — equivalent to $29 × 10 months
Schedule analyses to re-run automatically and track what changes over time. Start free — no credit card required.
Common questions
Pinkk is an intelligence research tool for creator, brand, and affiliate profiles. It runs structured research on any profile — evaluating signal quality, credibility, cross-platform context, compliance signals, partnership risk, and other public evidence — returning structured, confidence-rated findings so you can see what the data supports before making a decision.
Each intelligence report uses one credit. Subscription plans include credits each billing period, and credits from subscriptions, purchases, and signup bonuses all sit in one balance that does not expire. Credits are reserved when you submit a report and automatically returned if something goes wrong — you are only charged for reports that complete successfully.
Yes. Teams let multiple people access the same profiles, run reports, and share findings from one shared credit pool. The owner controls billing and can set granular permissions for each member. No per-seat billing.
Pinkk's findings are designed to be conservative, evidence-based, and confidence-rated. We surface what the available signals support, and we explicitly flag areas where confidence is lower or uncertainty remains.
Your profiles, reports, and findings belong to you. Pinkk does not sell your data, use it to train models, or share it with third parties. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and you can delete your account and associated data at any time.
Yes. Cancel at any time from your Wallet page. Access continues through the end of the current billing period — you won't be charged again after that. Credits included with your plan remain available until the subscription expires.
Your research starts here. The decision stays with you.
Join agencies and teams using Pinkk to research partners, investigate signals, and make decisions backed by evidence — not surface metrics.